Xbox 360 with X360 Key Installed. These are no longer made nor are they available anywhere. Does what RGH cannot do and that is play scene-released ISOs off of a NTFS Hard Drive. ISOs must be in a folder named 'games' without quotes and this folder must be in the root directory of the hard drive. GOD files converted back to the iso format will not work because the padding has been stripped off.The SDK Power Mac G5 for the Xbox 360.Without modification, or access to the necessary license keys or Authentication keys, you can’t put a game on the 360.On the other hand, security has been a big thing with MS in the last few years. Lets get a few things out of the way: 1. Then once your userbase is established, upgrade to a secure model, knowing that you'll take most of your users with you.I don’t know if your being serious, but I’ll take this (mostly) seriously for now. The Xbox 360 was officially unveiled on MTV on May 12, 2005, with detailed launch and I suppose it could have been a marketing ploy: make the Xbox security circumventable (although not so much so as to prevent plausible deniability) and allow a user base to grow based on piracy ripping off your platform partners.Since MS' in house games studios still lack the output to satisfy demand solo, they're somewhat dependant on goodwill to get ports of cool games from other platforms. The harder they lock it down, the harder they make it for partners to port to their platform. I have problems with "impossible" in this context. Well, I still don't believe it, anyway.So that leaves the question as to whether they have learned enough from the original XBox to make XBox2 impossible to hack. Well, not as a matter of marketing policy. I can't imagine that they'd deliberately build in security flaws.
I don't believe they do so today. Just like video arcade games largely died off when home computers got good enough graphics to compete, so will the online ones when some free alternative gets good enough.All I'm meaning is that in order to push performance to the limits, game developers often use or find undocumented features of the system.In the 80's, yes. From what I've read of most of the MMOGs, it's the same sort of scam, and people seem to be becoming aware of that.I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be a fad. I'm old enough to remember the first wave of computer moderated play-by-mail games and they dirty tricks some of them used to extort money from the players once they had invested deeply enough. On the other hand, I think there's a backlash brewing against these subscription games. Could you give a real example of a program using an undocumented feature, and also explain how it constituted a security problem?No, my post said that using the money from their monopoly in the OS market to sell a product at a loss in another market is the problem. That would not put any additional requirements whatsoever on the programmers.I don't buy it. Not due to using 'undocumented features' of any sort, but rather a simple programming error.Microsoft could easily fix that by having a nonexecutable stack, for instance. Using undocumented stuff is putting yourself at great risk of having your code break.But the more they tighten the secuirity model, the more strictly compliant the ported code will need to be.IIRC, the only security holes found so far in the original X-box which didn't require a modchip were buffer overrun failures. Revisions to the OS and hardware occur. Those things were nonexistant before, which encouraged that kind of stuff.Secondly, the platform isn't static. So if there is a power surge and your monitors contrast gets set WAY too high (above what you can even set with the user control panel) then you have to pay $250 for some overpaid fuckstick to plug in a cable and press "reset to factory settings" on this gay software. They have a hidden control panel in their monitors (at least some models) that you can only access using a special cable and special software, which of course only sony authorized repair centers can get. This is obvious from you complaining about "people like me" using a dollar sign in MS, despite me not doing that, and telling me to complain about Sony, when Sony isn't doing what MS is.And just so you know, I hate Sony. Wake up, nobody wants to try to converse with someone who will only ignore what they say and continue arguing with straw men and red herrings.You decided based on your own twisted view of the world that I am some anti-MS crusader. Perhaps they favor the drap and drop nature of everything, with file management being done by symbolic folders that automatically open up when you hold the mouse button down while pointing at one? Maybe OS X Tiger users just fell in love with the Dashboard widgets or the Spotlight search feature, or who knows?Same with any other OS I can think of. Party market happy to try to shore up those holes for a price - and plenty of customers willing to pay for those "improvements".)Most of the time, when someone expresses a strong preference for Mac OS X, they're really expressing a fondness for the overall look and feel of the GUI. A lot of pretty darn important systems run on Windows, despite all the complaints about it being "insecure". (And secondarily, technical debates on such things as security. Why would you expect everyone to be complaining about Sony when they aren't doing this, and MS is?The OS is rather irrelevant when you're talking about embedded systems or for that matter, any system which just does its designed tasks with little direct human interaction.That's why, as long as they keep on reading your ATM card and spitting out money properly, most people don't care a whole lot which OS their ATM machine runs.The only reason we really have "OS wars" today is because people have differing opinions on the way things should be presented on the screen to them as an interactive user of said OS. Power G5 Xbox 360 Emulator Full NT5 BetaDid indeed include a PowerPC version as well as the others. The full NT5 beta available from the MSDN when it was released. As long as it keeps running, people don't care what it runs.As anyone with a passion for other and more esoteric platforms will (or should) know.Windows NT existed on a number of different architectures other than Intel x86, Including MIPS, Alpha, and PowerPC, in versions 3.5 3.51 and 4.0.The final point to make is that when the work began on Windows 2000, the entire OS was done. If it just serves up web pages or files or acts as a back-end to a database, or whatever. No confusion of "What does the picture on my screen do that looks like *this*?" Easy to write down a step-by-step instruction sheet so anyone who can type can get a task done in it.None of these things really matter on a system that nobody interfaces with directly very often. "Only one exact way to do a specific task. They published statistics to prove it. Crowd, expects Microsoft adopts Linux for one of their strategic pieces?> Windows has the HAL that can absorb hardware differences, so there's no room for Linux and theWhen the Mac came out in '84, M$ told the DOS heads that using their keyboard macros was so much faster than using a mouse that using the mouse and gui will never make it into mainstream business. Which is in fact a very impressive degree of refinement over the original os when you examine the finer details.( My other boxes are FreeBSD and Solaris so dont dare call me a MS fan, XP is for my games only case wine isnt good enough and i pray it catches up sooner. )The effort involved in MS porting the NT 5 kernel and other systems to the Xbox 360 would have been totaly comparable to the effort needed to strip and optimise the nt 5 core for the Xbox. Hiawatha bicycle serial numbersAll of the windows heads developed mass amnesia, and told us all how M$ runs the internet.History says that if M$ changed their stance and started pushing Linux, embrased and extended into proprietary hell, of course, then all the current Linux haters will tell you how great M$ Linux is, and forget they ever bashed it.M$s main power is brainwashing. Then M$ came out with IE, and told everyone that it is the business app of the future. Hell, you had to jump through hoops to even get windows running TCP/IP back then. It was run by Universities and will never be applicable to the modern business world. It would seem that the choice was obvious. So at the time MS had the choice between using a Win 9X codebase, a CE codebase or NT/2000 codebase.Windows 9X compatibility wasn't a requirement so could be ignored, CE was optimised for lower power CPUs and had been a less than a stellar success in the Dreamcast, whilst the NT/2000 codebase was optimised for higher end processors x86/PPC/MIPS/Alpha. Hated is the easiest way to bind any community.First off, it was pretty obvious that MS were going to use existing code on the original XBOX, if only because it was to all intents and puropses a PC. They will blindly follow whatever Redmond tells them, as long as they have Linux and Apple or whoever to despise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorRhonda ArchivesCategories |